A Nigerian man with past convictions for armed robbery and drug offenses has avoided deportation from the United Kingdom after a judge ruled that his belief in “possession” could put him in danger if sent back to Nigeria.
The individual, whose identity remains undisclosed for legal reasons, was sentenced to seven years in prison in 2011 for an armed robbery at a brothel. In 2018, he was imprisoned again for selling crack cocaine.
Despite a deportation order issued in April 2014, he successfully challenged it on human rights grounds and has remained in the UK for over ten years.
His case was supported by concerns that his mental health condition, combined with a belief in possession, could leave him vulnerable in Nigeria due to the country’s views on supernatural influences.
After spending time in a secure psychiatric facility, he now resides in the community but is still classified as a “high risk of serious harm” to the public.
Reports also indicate that he continues to struggle with crack cocaine addiction.
Judge Stephen Smith ruled that an earlier legal assessment of the case was flawed, stating that the man’s belief in possession could lead to discrimination and harm in Nigeria.
“We find that his continued expression of this belief increases the likelihood that others will interpret his illness as a sign of possession,” The Telegraph quoted Smith as saying.
A report presented during the appeal, supported by Amnesty International, warned that his return to Nigeria could expose him to social stigma and even physical harm.
Medical assessments diagnosed him with a trauma-related disorder with psychotic symptoms, including recurring intrusive thoughts, nightmares, and a belief that supernatural forces are influencing his mind.
He also described experiencing sleep paralysis, which he attributed to demonic interference.
During the hearing, the man expressed his determination to turn his life around.
“I don’t want to go back to that life. I want to live a normal life, away from crime,” he stated.
His key worker testified that he had been actively engaging in positive activities, including frequent gym visits and volunteering.
READ ALSO:
- Gbenga Adeyinka to host QEDNG Summit as Kiekie joins speakers
- University student allegedly beaten to death over missing iPhone, NANS demands justice
- NANS condemns remand of ex FUOYE SUG president, plans protests in Ekiti
- NURTW disputes Osun INEC’s position on leadership crisis, reaffirms Baruwa as President
- WAFU B U-20 Championship: Flying Eagles overcome Ghana in opener
However, concerns have been raised about the broader implications of the case. Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, questioned why the UK should take responsibility for a foreign national with a history of serious crimes.
“This is a concerning case. Why should Britain bear the burden of treating individuals from other countries who have committed serious offenses?” he asked.
“I understand that he has mental health issues, but why should the UK be responsible for his care and allow him to stay when he poses a significant risk?”
Following the judge’s decision, the case is now set for a new hearing.
