I am not a fan of Ayodele Fayose, the Governor of Ekiti State, as I detest his styles of governance, lust to court troubles and the limitless controversies that surround his personality, yet I received with shock the news report that EFCC has frozen his personal bank account.
This indeed came as a shock considering the personality involved, a sitting governor that enjoys immunity till the determination of his office as governor of a State in Nigeria.
It is the law that to freeze an account, there must be an order of court for the attachment of the bank account as the Section 34 (1) of the EFCC Act stipulates how such freezing order can be obtained, this requires the Commission through filling court process to apply to the Court ex-parte for such order.
By the provision of Section 308(1)(a) of our Constitution as amended no suit can be instituted against Ayodele Fayose and/or any Nigerian governor in any court in Nigeria.
Therefore, no process of court can be issued, signed or served, against Ayodele Fayose in his personal capacity, whereas the bank account in question is his personal account as such in his personal name.
Moreover, Sections 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 of the EFCC Act, established a process to be followed that is, a suspect must have been arrested for property to be attached and or his account to be frozen however section 308 of 1999 Constitution, exempted Ayodele Fayose from those could be arrested and his bank account, particularly his personal account therefore cannot be frozen.
It behoves on all right thinking Nigerians and law abiding individuals and corporate entities to ensure and insist that EFCC acts according to the law of the land and adheres to best international standard and practice.
While the present war against corruption is applauded, it should be warned that EFCC is gradually turning into an unchecked tyrannical monster under the guise of fighting corruption.
If indeed Ayodele Fayose has a case to answer, the case of Bola Ahmed Tinubu Vs. Gani Fawehinmi is apt and locus classicus;
Therefore, EFCC should lift the attachment on Ayodele Fayose’s property, go ahead to investigate him, after which, it is either they bring the report of his misconduct before his State House of Assembly for his removal via impeachment process or wait for Fayose to complete his term of office before commencing his prosecution.
That’s the law and it must be followed.
Dr. Kayode Ajulo
