Owners of clubs involved in the European Super League (ESL) plans are likely to have to agree to a peace pact with the European Club Association (ECA).
ECA sources said this will be necessary if they (the owners, such as the Glazers and Roman Abramovich) are to be readmitted to the influential lobbying group.
The Premier League had announced earlier this week that it was working on a new “Owners Charter”.
This will commit those responsible for making the key decisions at the club to the league’s core principles.
It is understood a similar pact is a possibility at ECA level as a means to provide assurance to current members of the group.
The 12 Super League clubs resigned from the ECA at the point the new breakaway competition was announced on April 18.
But informal conversations between those currently involved in ECA and representatives of some of those clubs have already taken place, with different camps emerging among the dozen.
Some within the ECA believe “it won’t end well” if the big clubs are not welcomed back to the organisation at some point.
But there is no sense of haste among the ECA leadership to rush to a decision on when and how that happens.
ECA remains the key body which negotiates with UEFA on commercial, regulation and competition matters on behalf of the clubs.
Already, European football’s governing body is understood to be supportive of having the clubs return to the ECA.
It was heavily involved in the negotiations which led to UEFA approving a new 36-team Champions League on April 19.
It is a format which has been criticised by Manchester City midfielder Ilkay Gundogan, among others, as “the lesser of two evils” compared to the Super League.
However, it is understood the ECA would not be in favour of altering its position on the extra matches within the plan – 10 at the group stage compared to the current six.
It will also not support the qualification changes which give historically successful clubs a “safety net” if they miss out on qualifying as of right via domestic competition.
The new format was the result of an almighty compromise, a source said, and to pick at certain aspects of it could lead to a return to square one.
Aki Riihilahti, current chief executive of HJK Helsinki and member of the ECA board, says the changes to European competition had the support of smaller clubs, not just the continent’s giants.
The former Crystal Palace player said last month: “If everything was unanimous (on April 16), then for me it is agreed.
“If you look at it for a wider perspective, this is 100 per cent better. The whole system, for most European countries, is improved.
“For everyone outside of the top five leagues, unfortunately the only way to be relevant is to play at the European level.
“I am looking to access the Europa Conference League (with HJK). My players and fans would die to be in that. This is a game changer for smaller countries.”
Attempts to pick apart the format may be viewed as “opportunistic” from an ECA perspective.
Its belief is that if there is to be a debate about the football calendar and ensuring quality over quantity, it has to involve all stakeholders.
And these will be in competitions across the domestic and international game.(dpa/NAN)
